The new energy horizon
The
US is becoming energy independent, which might mean a certain level of
disengagement from the Middle East. Here are the energy, political and security
implications for India and what India can do about it.
The
demise of oil and gas is greatly exaggerated. As more and more sources of oil
and gas are unearthed, and new technologies are coaxing oil out of obscure
places like tar sands, the world can relax where oil supplies are concerned.
What
should we be concerned about? Well, the less important worry is the immediate
future of renewable energy is bleak.
The
game changer is that the US, long dependent on Middle East oil with a foreign
policy to match, and the chief guarantor of security in this volatile region, is
marching towards energy self-reliance _ and that would change the world.
US’
official projections say their oil imports will drop 20 per cent by 2025.
Citigroup, in a much-talked about report earlier this year described America as
the “new Middle East.” Ed Morse, one of the world’s best known energy analysts
described the US as “a growing hydrocarbon net exporting center, with the
lowest natural gas feedstock costs in the world, supporting thriving exports
of energy-intensive goods from petrochemicals to steel.” Between better energy efficiency
standards to an abundance of “tight oil”, the US’ “status update” is a
nightmare waiting to happen __ for many in the Middle East.
According
to the Citi report, “five incremental sources of liquids growth could make
North America the largest source of new supply in the next decade: Oil sands
production in Canada, deepwater in the US and Mexico, oil from shale and tight
sands, natural gas liquids [NGLs] associated with the production of natural
gas, and biofuels. Putting these together, North America as a whole could add
over 11 million barrels a day of liquids from over 15 million barrels a day in
2010 to almost 27 million barrels a day by 2020-22.” Keeping up the breathless
analysis, a study by Harvard University’s Belfer Center, study said the US could
cough up 11.6 mbd of crude and NGL by 2020 making it the second largest oil
producer in the world after Saudi Arabia.
It
may free the US from a terrible stranglehold by Middle Eastern Arab oil producers.
“The past image of the United States as helplessly dependent on imported oil
and gas from politically unstable and unfriendly regions of the world no longer
holds,” former CIA Director John Deutsch was quoted telling an energy conference
recently.
An energy independent
America will have huge geopolitical implications __ from the politics of the
Middle East and the future of Israel, Iran and Saudi Arabia, to Indian Ocean
piracy and South China Sea.
Looking
out from New Delhi, the world could look and feel very different.
The
US has already begun a strategic “pivot” to east/southeast Asia focusing
attention on China. “That’s a good thing from our point of view,” said top
level Indian strategy leaders. If China is emerging as India’s topmost
strategic challenge, India would be happier with a more robust US presence in
this region. On the other side, with a more disengaged US, India reckons it can
make its own equations with the Middle Eastern countries and the Gulf, on more
India-friendly terms.
But
things may not be as easy. India as one of the largest energy importers could
become politically vulnerable to the same toxic regimes the US is freeing
itself from. Saudi Arabia has crawled up as India’s top energy supplier. With
sanctions against Iran, Iraq is up at no. 2. Kuwait, Qatar, Iran, UAE, all of
them are part of India’s every-growing energy import basket, and none of them
inspire confidence in terms of stability, not after 2011’s Arab Spring, which
promises to keep things volatile here for some time to come.
Saudi
Arabia is moving closer to India. Certainly, recent events might show that it
is straining away from the ideological grip it was in with Pakistan. But India
still has huge issues with Saudi Arabia exporting radical Wahhabi Islam through
its charity and religious networks that actively contributes to militancy and
intolerance. Being beholden to Riyadh for energy, how much will India be able
to influence Saudi behaviour?
Second,
with a cooling off by the US, some analysts predict greater sectarian conflict
in the region. We can already see that in Syria, which is now a thinly
disguised battleground for sectarian wars. India will have to wade into the
intricate and difficult politics of this region if it has to negotiate its own
interests (resources, investments, remittances and influence) in this volatile
region.
Pakistan
has greater ability to make mischief here, having strong linkages here.
Besides, the fragile balance we see today could be shattered if Iran gets
itself a nuclear weapons capability. That could bring Pakistan closer to the
Saudis again (at what cost to India?) not to speak of the fact that
polarization would become sharper.
Ordinarily,
India could negotiate these choppy waters. But with weak central governments,
regions and religions playing cynical politics within India, its easy to
imagine India falling prey to the kind of influences that prompted New Delhi to
turn against close neighbour and ally Sri Lanka, at the Human Rights Council.
One only has to see India’s flailing policy on Syria to realise New Delhi is
far from making mature choices here.
Third,
the US, one should remember, is not in the Middle East merely to get oil. It
plays an important role as a net provider of security, balances between different,
opposing forces, protects Israel, all with formidable naval power. If it thins
out in future (for a combination of reasons, many economical), can India pick
up the mantle of being a provider of security?
India
is building up its naval capability faster than most people realize __ its
building almost 45 ships even as we speak. India has provided security for
energy shipments through the Straits of Malacca in the past. It will have to
move west into the Straits of Hormuz and further, all the way to the Gulf of
Aden in the role of security provider not only for its own energy shipments
but others like Japan and Korea. If China-Japan ties deteriorate, that could
have its own impact on India’s role.
First,
though, India will need to be the master of the Indian Ocean. The Indian Ocean
must become India’s Ocean. National security adviser, Shiv Shankar Menon, has
set up a trilateral with Maldives and Sri Lanka to monitor the Indian Ocean.
Tying up with powers like Japan, Tanzania, Ethiopia, Mauritius and Seychelles
and Oman, India can achieve collaborative security in the Indian Ocean, being primus inter pares, rather than a big
brother with vassals.
But
there is something else. If US companies find energy to be cheaply available at
home, they might not be that interested in plowing through unstable regimes and
countries in Africa. That would leave Africa, central Asia and parts of Latin
America open to different kinds of influences. India would have to sharpen its
game in these areas of the world if it is to triumph over the Chinese
juggernaut, and no, Bollywood cannot help,
I’m afraid.
On
the energy side, India should take a hard look at its energy mix. It would make
a lot more sense to give greater weightage to gas __ cleaner, safer and a
viable alternative to oil. Qatar is currently virtually the sole supplier.
India is looking at alternatives, and finding them. Indian companies like
Videocon have hit gas gold off the coast in Mozambique, brightening prospects
for offshore gas from the eastern seaboard of Indian Ocean. This can be
replicated off Tanzania and, hold your breath, Somalia. Myanmar is a
possibility, as is Australia where India has stakes in the Gorgon project. On
the western front, Israel, with its newly found embarrassment of gas riches could
become a supplier. Having already offered to sell to India and got an
affirmative, Israel recently sent its energy minister to talk supplies and
pipelines with the Indians. When the US can overcome its FTA problems, India is
keen to make the US a major supplier of energy. Canada is emerging as an
attractive proposition for the entire energy mix __ gas, oil, nuclear.
Even
in oil supplies, India is spreading itself out. Iraq is now India’s second
largest supplier. Oil purchases from Kuwait climbed 54 per cent in the last year.
With US sanctions against Iran, India is, for the first time, picking up oil
from Azerbaijan. In September, OVL bought US energy firm Hess Corp's stake in
Azeri, Chirag and Guneshli (AGC) group of oil fields in Azerbaijan for $1
billion. This also gives OVL a foothold in the crucial Baku-Ceyhan pipeline.
India
has been shortlisted to prospect for oil in northern Afghanistan (Afghan-Tajik
basin), though that may be a while coming. India has got a toehold in oil
projects in Sudan, and that’s something to hold on to for the long term.
Finally,
let no Fukushima get in the way of nuclear energy. Manmohan Singh has been a
positive tiger in only one respect __ nuclear energy. And he’s right. Nuclear
energy will play a greater role in providing for clean and reliable energy.
In
the continuing protests at Kudankulam, the government can be faulted for bad
PR, but for once both executive and judiciary are on the same page regarding
the importance of this source of energy.
Germany,
which, in a fit of emotion, shut down its nuclear power plants, is beginning to
repent at leisure. Japan, with the Fukushima disaster fresh in their minds, shut
down their plants, but recent calculations say japan would have to spend over
$637 billion to make the nuclear-to-oil switch. As China-Japan tensions
intensify, and energy shipments become vulnerable, nuclear may well return as a
steady bet.
India
shot itself in the foot with a clumsy law that’s making it difficult for
nuclear industry to grow. That will be fixed, because the PM is personally
interested. India needs to push hard to get into the four non-proliferation
regimes. Kazakhstan, Namibia, Canada will be great suppliers of uranium, as
will Australia. A nuclear backup is essential cushion if energy needs to travel
long distances and over choppy waters.
Within
India, without getting into the coal and gas complications, India needs to
encourage shale oil and shale gas extraction, and improve natural gas extraction.
The US energy revolution has been the work of huge numbers of independent
private companies, that’s the way India might have to go, because state
entities are not up to it..
Did
we forget China in all of this? China is the presumptive superpower. China is
ramping up military capabilities faster than any other country in history.
China, with its deep pockets, can become a bigger player in the Middle East at
a shot. Its already helping out the Syrian regime, opposing western attempts at
dislodging Assad. (India is all over the place). With a permission to explore
10000 sq km of Indian Ocean for minerals, China can legitimately position
military capabilities here. China has made deep inroads into Africa, Latin
America and central Asia. Its building infrastructure in these countries at an
astonishing pace. Its hoovering up resources from every imaginable corner of
the earth. It’s strategic challenger is the US. China does not like India. Need
we say more?
(Published in The Times of India Crest Edition, October 31, 2012)
Comments
Post a Comment